Celeron M 353 vs A110
Primary details
Comparing A110 and Celeron M 353 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | June 2007 (17 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A110 and Celeron M 353 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A110 and Celeron M 353 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and Celeron M 353. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 5 Watt |
A110 has 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A110 and Celeron M 353. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A110 and Celeron M 353, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
