Celeron M 340 vs A10 Micro-6700T
Aggregate performance score
A10 Micro-6700T outperforms Celeron M 340 by a whopping 543% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2534 | 3315 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 18.93 | 0.63 |
| Architecture codename | Mullins (2014) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 512 KB L2 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.356V |
Compatibility
Information on A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FT3b | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 24.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.90 | 0.14 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 24 Watt |
A10 Micro-6700T has a 542.9% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.
The A10 Micro-6700T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 340 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Micro-6700T and Celeron M 340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
