Athlon X4 950 vs A10-5800K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5800K
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.87
Athlon X4 950
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.26
+20.9%

Athlon X4 950 outperforms A10-5800K by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5800K and Athlon X4 950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19951828
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.353.66
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.773.29
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon X4 950 has 946% better value for money than A10-5800K.

Detailed specifications

A10-5800K and Athlon X4 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on A10-5800K and Athlon X4 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2AM4
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5800K and Athlon X4 950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5800K and Athlon X4 950 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5800K and Athlon X4 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7660D (800 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5800K 1.87
Athlon X4 950 2.26
+20.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5800K 2963
Athlon X4 950 3591
+21.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-5800K 451
Athlon X4 950 632
+40.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-5800K 1094
Athlon X4 950 1571
+43.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.87 2.26
Recency 2 October 2012 27 July 2017
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon X4 950 has a 20.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X4 950 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5800K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5800K and Athlon X4 950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5800K
A10-5800K
AMD Athlon X4 950
Athlon X4 950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 510 votes

Rate A10-5800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 291 vote

Rate Athlon X4 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5800K or Athlon X4 950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.