Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs A10-4657M

Place in the ranking	2411	3006
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD A-Series	Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency	3.00	1.08
Architecture codename	Trinity (2012−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	1 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-4657M and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.3 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	2 GHz
Bus rate	no data	800 MHz
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	4 MB	1 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	246 mm²	no data
Number of transistors	1303 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on A10-4657M and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	BGA	Socket P 478
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4657M and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA	no data
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-

Security technologies

A10-4657M and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-4657M 1.11
+178%

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 0.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-4657M 1759
+178%

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 633

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.11	0.40
Recency	1 April 2013	1 February 2010
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm

A10-4657M has a 177.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The A10-4657M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4657M and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.