Celeron 5305U vs A10-4657M
Primary details
Comparing A10-4657M and Celeron 5305U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2411 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.00 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | no data |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-4657M and Celeron 5305U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1303 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A10-4657M and Celeron 5305U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4657M and Celeron 5305U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2013 | 1 April 2020 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
A10-4657M has 100% more threads.
Celeron 5305U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-4657M and Celeron 5305U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4657M and Celeron 5305U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
