Celeron 5305U vs Athlon X2 QL-67

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-67 and Celeron 5305U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlonno data
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)no data
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-67 and Celeron 5305U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Bus rate4000 MHz4 GT/s
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nmno data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-67 and Celeron 5305U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1g2no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-67 and Celeron 5305U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-67 and Celeron 5305U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 1 April 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 5305U has an age advantage of 10 years, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-67 and Celeron 5305U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-67 and Celeron 5305U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-67
Athlon X2 QL-67
Intel Celeron 5305U
Celeron 5305U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon X2 QL-67 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 5305U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-67 or Celeron 5305U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.