GeForce GT 230 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRedwoodG92B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (14 years ago)27 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40096
Core clock speed775 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors627 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate15.5024.00
Floating-point processing power0.62 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs812
TMUs2048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s24 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 27 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 75 Watt

ATI HD 5690 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 17.2% lower power consumption.

GT 230 OEM, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5690 and GeForce GT 230 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5690
Radeon HD 5690
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
GeForce GT 230 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 5690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5690 or GeForce GT 230 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.