Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs GeForce GTX TITAN X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), including specs and performance data.
GTX TITAN X outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 652% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 199 | 710 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 97 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.87 | no data |
Power efficiency | 9.28 | no data |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) | RDNA 2 (2022−2023) |
GPU code name | GM200 | Raphael |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2015 (10 years ago) | 26 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | 2200 MHz |
Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 209.1 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 6.691 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 96 | no data |
TMUs | 192 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
SLI options | 4x | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | no data |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
HDMI | + | - |
HDCP | + | - |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
GameStream | + | - |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | - |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | no data |
GameWorks | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | - |
CUDA | 5.2 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 140−150
+637%
| 19
−637%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 7.14 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Valorant | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 41
+0%
|
41
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Valorant | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 37
+0%
|
37
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Valorant | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Valorant | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Sons of the Forest | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
This is how GTX TITAN X and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:
- GTX TITAN X is 637% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 30.45 | 4.05 |
Recency | 17 March 2015 | 26 September 2022 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
GTX TITAN X has a 651.9% higher aggregate performance score.
Graphics (Ryzen 7000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.