Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X vs Xeon E5-2682 v4
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2682 v4 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 820 | 971 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 3.78 | 3.95 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 21 | 34 |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 40 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 456.12 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 7200 Million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.67 | 8.83 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 29 June 2017 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon E5-2682 v4 has a 20.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 26.3% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
