EPYC Embedded 3401 vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking818not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency3.72no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (9 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC Embedded 3401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3216
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.85 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2118.5
L1 cacheno data1536 KB
L2 cache4 MB8 MB
L3 cache40 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors7200 Million9600 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC Embedded 3401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC Embedded 3401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC Embedded 3401 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC Embedded 3401 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC Embedded 3401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1,536 GB1 TiB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC Embedded 3401.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 21 February 2018
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 100% more threads.

EPYC Embedded 3401, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 41.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3401. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
Xeon E5-2682 v4
AMD EPYC Embedded 3401
EPYC Embedded 3401

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 160 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2682 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate EPYC Embedded 3401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5-2682 v4 and EPYC Embedded 3401, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.