Athlon XP 2000+ vs Mobile Sempron 2600+
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Sempron 2600+ outperforms Athlon XP 2000+ by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3561 | 3620 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Mobile Sempron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.25 | 0.07 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Dublin | Thorton (2001−2003) |
| Release date | no data | January 2002 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $25 |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Athlon XP 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 150 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Athlon XP 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 70 Watt |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 70 Watt |
Mobile Sempron 2600+ has a 36.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 180% lower power consumption.
The AMD Mobile Sempron 2600+ is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon XP 2000+ in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobile Sempron 2600+ is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 2000+ is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
