Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron M 410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 410
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.07
Athlon X2 BE-2300
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 45 Watt
0.32
+357%

Athlon X2 BE-2300 outperforms Celeron M 410 by a whopping 357% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36673321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.110.30
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Brisbane (2007−2008)
Release dateno dataOctober 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 410 and Athlon X2 BE-2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.46 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 410 and Athlon X2 BE-2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478AM2
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 410 and Athlon X2 BE-2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 410 and Athlon X2 BE-2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 410 and Athlon X2 BE-2300 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron M 410 0.07
Athlon X2 BE-2300 0.32
+357%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron M 410 123
Samples: 45
Athlon X2 BE-2300 570
+363%
Samples: 38

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.07 0.32
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron M 410 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Athlon X2 BE-2300, on the other hand, has a 357.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 410 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 410 is a notebook processor while Athlon X2 BE-2300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 410
Celeron M 410
AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300
Athlon X2 BE-2300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon X2 BE-2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M 410 and Athlon X2 BE-2300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.