Ultra 7 155H vs Ultra 9 285H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
2025, $651
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.37
+38.4%
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023, $503
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
14.00

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Core Ultra 7 155H by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking348573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.3823.29
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency18.3221.28
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2025)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$651$503

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 9 285H has 18% better value for money than Ultra 7 155H.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-cores66
Efficient-cores88
Low Power Efficient-cores22
Threads1622
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C110 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNNOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency2.35 GHz2.25 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.212.2
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2412

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 285H 19.37
+38.4%
Ultra 7 155H 14.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 285H 34217
+38.3%
Samples: 767
Ultra 7 155H 24742
Samples: 4897

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 15435
+26.7%
Ultra 7 155H 12184

7-Zip Single

Ultra 9 285H 6069
+12.4%
Ultra 7 155H 5398

7-Zip

Ultra 9 285H 56987
Ultra 7 155H 60595
+6.3%

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 9 285H 1993
+18.2%
Ultra 7 155H 1686

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 9 285H 289
+13.3%
Ultra 7 155H 255

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 9 285H 379
Ultra 7 155H 380
+0.3%

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 16369
+32.2%
Ultra 7 155H 12385

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ultra 9 285H 2847
+18.2%
Ultra 7 155H 2409

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 15330
+23.8%
Ultra 7 155H 12385

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.37 14.00
Recency 13 January 2025 14 December 2023
Threads 16 22
Chip lithography 3 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 28 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 38.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Ultra 7 155H, on the other hand, has 37.5% more threads, and 60.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 115 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1032 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 155H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.