Ultra 7 256V vs Ultra 9 285H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
2025, $651
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.37
+75%

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Core Ultra 7 256V by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking348788
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.38no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency18.3227.71
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2025)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)24 September 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$651no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores64
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores24
Threads168
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNNOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUIntel® Arc™ 140V GPU
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency2.35 GHz1.95 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.212.2
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes248

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 285H 19.37
+75%
Ultra 7 256V 11.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 285H 34217
+74.9%
Samples: 767
Ultra 7 256V 19559
Samples: 322

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ultra 9 285H 2613
+7.3%
Ultra 7 256V 2435

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ultra 9 285H 14846
+52%
Ultra 7 256V 9765

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 15435
+64.9%
Ultra 7 256V 9361

7-Zip Single

Ultra 9 285H 6069
+6%
Ultra 7 256V 5727

7-Zip

Ultra 9 285H 56987
+58.5%
Ultra 7 256V 35950

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 9 285H 1993
+19.8%
Ultra 7 256V 1663

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 9 285H 289
+1.7%
Ultra 7 256V 284

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 9 285H 379
Ultra 7 256V 534
+40.9%

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 16369
+49.3%
Ultra 7 256V 10962

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ultra 9 285H 2847
+3%
Ultra 7 256V 2763

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 15330
+40%
Ultra 7 256V 10952

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.37 11.07
Recency 13 January 2025 24 September 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ultra 7 256V, on the other hand, has 164.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 115 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 50 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.