Ryzen 3 1100 vs Celeron M U3400
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3334 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 24 May 2010 (15 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 3 1100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 4800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 3 1100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1288 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 3 1100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 3 1100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 3 1100 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen 3 1100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M U3400 has 261.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 1100, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M U3400 and AMD Ryzen 3 1100. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M U3400 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 1100 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
