Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Celeron M U3400
Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3329 | 3338 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | 0.31 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Oakville (2003−2004) |
| Release date | 24 May 2010 (15 years ago) | August 2003 (21 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128K |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1288 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron M U3400 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 94.4% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Celeron M U3400 and AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
