Arc A310 vs Xe DG1
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 366 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 13.25 |
Architecture | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
GPU code name | DG1 | DG2-128 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 2020 (4 years ago) | 12 October 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1550 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5,000 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 62.00 | 64.00 |
Floating-point processing power | 1.984 TFLOPS | 3.072 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 20 | 16 |
TMUs | 40 | 32 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 96 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 6 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 164 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz | 1937 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 124.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
Xe DG1 has 150% lower power consumption.
Arc A310, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xe DG1 and Arc A310. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.