Radeon RX 9070 vs Xbox Series S GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated33
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.19
Power efficiencyno data20.72
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameLockhartNavi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)6 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12803584
Core clock speed1565 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate125.2564.5
Floating-point processing power4.006 TFLOPS36.13 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs80224
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Length274 mm267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.21.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2020 6 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 220 Watt

Xbox Series S GPU has 120% lower power consumption.

RX 9070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xbox Series S GPU and Radeon RX 9070. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox Series S GPU
Xbox Series S GPU
AMD Radeon RX 9070
Radeon RX 9070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 906 votes

Rate Xbox Series S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 202 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xbox Series S GPU or Radeon RX 9070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.