Radeon 780M vs ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated298
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Power efficiencyno data84.45
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameXenos FalconPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 October 2007 (17 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240768
Core clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2700 MHz
Number of transistors232 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000129.6
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 October 2007 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 80 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1900% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xbox 360 GPU 80nm and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox 360 GPU 80nm is a notebook card while Radeon 780M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Xbox 360 GPU 80nm
Xbox 360 GPU 80nm
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xbox 360 GPU 80nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1466 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.