CMP 30HX vs ATI Xbox 360 E GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.33
Power efficiencyno data11.76
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameXenos CoronaTU116
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 June 2013 (11 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2401408
Core clock speed500 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors372 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000157.1
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1688

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x4
Length264 mm229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 June 2013 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 125 Watt

ATI Xbox 360 E GPU has 4.2% lower power consumption.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xbox 360 E GPU and CMP 30HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox 360 E GPU is a desktop card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Xbox 360 E GPU
Xbox 360 E GPU
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Xbox 360 E GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.