Radeon 630 vs XGI Volari V8

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.10
ArchitectureXG4 (2003−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameXG40Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 September 2003 (21 year ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed300 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors110 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40038.98
Floating-point processing powerno data1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 September 2003 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between XGI Volari V8 and Radeon 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that XGI Volari V8 is a desktop card while Radeon 630 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


XGI Volari V8
Volari V8
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate XGI Volari V8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.