Quadro4 400 NVS PCI vs XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXG4 (2003−2005)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameXG41NV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 September 2003 (21 year ago)16 July 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed350 MHz220 MHz
Number of transistors90 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate1.4000.88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCI
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz332 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x LFH60

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.08.0
OpenGL1.41.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 September 2003 16 July 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm

XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

We couldn't decide between XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra and Quadro4 400 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra is a desktop card while Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra
Volari Duo V5 Ultra
NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.