RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs UHD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
L20 L40 L40 CNX L40G L40S RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics
2021
10 Watt
5.43

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms UHD Graphics by a whopping 1212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61418
Place by popularity6not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.55
Power efficiency38.5816.88
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25618176
Core clock speed350 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate12.001,423
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs16568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data960.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 5.43
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 71.26
+1212%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 2151
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28223
+1212%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−1257%
190
+1257%
1440p12−14
−1233%
160
+1233%
4K8−9
−1338%
115
+1338%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data35.78
1440pno data42.49
4Kno data59.12

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 164
+0%
164
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 163
+0%
163
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 113
+0%
113
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Dota 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Fortnite 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 147
+0%
147
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Dota 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
+0%
219
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Dota 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1257% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1233% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1338% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.43 71.26
Recency 11 January 2021 3 December 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 300 Watt

UHD Graphics has 2900% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 1212.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics is a notebook card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
vs
RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
RX 5500 Radeon RX 5500
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 5500 XT
vs
FirePro W4300 W4300
RX 9070 XT Radeon RX 9070 XT
vs
RX 5500 XT RX 5500 XT
Iris Plus Graphics Iris Plus Graphics
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB RTX 3060 8 GB
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
RX 570 X2 RX 570 X2
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
R6E Mobile Graphics R6E Mobile Graphics
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4400 Ti 4400
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
GRID M40 M40
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
vs
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB V100 SXM3 32 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 7046 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 104 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.