UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020
28 Watt
4.55
+128%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking649884
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.2513.85
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4832
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.55
+128%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 2.00

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510
+121%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1589

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650
+68.6%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 6317

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 2321
+128%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1016

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 15992
+129%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 6977

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 97416
+35%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 72158

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 798
+142%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 330

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
+88.9%
9
−88.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 11
+175%
4−5
−175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Hitman 3 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 36
+112%
16−18
−112%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+88.9%
9
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
+100%
6
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+23.1%
13
−23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+167%
3
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 89% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs surpassed UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.55 2.00
Recency 15 August 2020 11 January 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 127.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 600% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 453 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 17 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.