T400 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs with T400, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020
28 Watt
4.36

T400 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking659476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.2321.54
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48384
Core clock speed350 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−76.5%
30−35
+76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Counter-Strike 2 7
−100%
14−16
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 21
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Valorant 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Dota 2 15
−100%
30−33
+100%
Far Cry 5 22
−105%
45−50
+105%
Fortnite 27−30
−104%
55−60
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−80%
18−20
+80%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−105%
80−85
+105%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Valorant 12
−100%
24−27
+100%
World of Tanks 25
−100%
50−55
+100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Dota 2 24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 14
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−105%
80−85
+105%
Valorant 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
World of Tanks 30−35
−97%
65−70
+97%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Valorant 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Dota 2 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−87.5%
30−33
+87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Fortnite 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Valorant 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and T400 compete in popular games:

  • T400 is 76% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.36 8.96
Recency 15 August 2020 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 30 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

T400, on the other hand, has a 105.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook card while T400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
NVIDIA T400
T400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 482 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 381 vote

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.