Radeon 660M vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and Radeon 660M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020
28 Watt
4.56

660M outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking656332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.1627.95
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48384
Core clock speed350 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data45.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.459 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.56
Radeon 660M 16.31
+258%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510
Radeon 660M 6743
+92.1%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650
Radeon 660M 23222
+118%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 2321
Radeon 660M 4848
+109%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 15992
Radeon 660M 31515
+97.1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 97416
Radeon 660M 283076
+191%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 798
Radeon 660M 1544
+93.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−38.9%
25
+38.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 11
−118%
24
+118%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
−117%
26
+117%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−150%
20
+150%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−108%
27−30
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Hitman 3 10
−110%
21
+110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 36
−50%
50−55
+50%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−88.2%
30−35
+88.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−37.8%
60−65
+37.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−375%
19
+375%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14
+75%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−108%
27−30
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Hitman 3 10−11
−110%
21
+110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−94.1%
33
+94.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−37.8%
60−65
+37.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Hitman 3 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
−83.3%
22
+83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−68.8%
27
+68.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−87.5%
15
+87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−37.8%
60−65
+37.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−438%
40−45
+438%
Hitman 3 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hitman 3 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−925%
40−45
+925%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 7−8

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 660M is 39% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 660M is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 660M is ahead in 67 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.56 16.31
Recency 15 August 2020 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 40 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has a 257.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 464 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 324 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.