GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) with GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
2021
4 Watt
1.39

RTX 3060 8 GB outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 2769% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1005106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.6916.35
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGen. 11GA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores243584
Core clock speed350 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data199.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.74 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data112
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1875 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data240.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−2650%
220−230
+2650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2757%
400−450
+2757%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2650%
220−230
+2650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2627%
900−950
+2627%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2757%
400−450
+2757%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2627%
900−950
+2627%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2757%
400−450
+2757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2650%
220−230
+2650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2627%
900−950
+2627%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and RTX 3060 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 8 GB is 2650% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.39 39.88
Recency 11 January 2021 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 170 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has 4150% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 2769.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 121 vote

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 694 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.