Radeon Pro W6400 vs UHD Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.00
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed200 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate16.00111.9
Floating-point processing power0.512 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2020 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics G7 and Radeon Pro W6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G7
UHD Graphics G7
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 28 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.