UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2019
12 Watt
3.13

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking748673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.67no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameIce Lake G1 Gen. 11Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3232
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4no data
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX 12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 3.13
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 4.31
+37.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 2127
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 3322
+56.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 1521
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 2493
+63.9%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 11097
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 12523
+12.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−23.1%
16
+23.1%
4K9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−133%
14
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Hitman 3 6
−167%
16
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−26.1%
27−30
+26.1%
Metro Exodus 12
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6
−117%
13
+117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−12.8%
40−45
+12.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9
+800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−220%
16
+220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−117%
13
+117%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Hitman 3 8−9
−50%
12
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−26.1%
27−30
+26.1%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−50%
6
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−12.8%
40−45
+12.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−100%
12
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Hitman 3 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−240%
16−18
+240%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−12.8%
40−45
+12.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hitman 3 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 23% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 75% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is ahead in 37 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (33%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.13 4.31
Recency 28 May 2019 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has a 37.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 364 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.