UHD Graphics 710 vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with UHD Graphics 710, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2019
12 Watt
3.14
+9.8%

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms UHD Graphics 710 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking755793
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.6513.13
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameIce Lake G1 Gen. 11Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32128
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3328 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
+30%
10−12
−30%
4K9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Elden Ring 6
+20%
5−6
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Metro Exodus 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Elden Ring 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Fortnite 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
World of Tanks 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Elden Ring 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
World of Tanks 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Valorant 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and UHD Graphics 710 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 30% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 13% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.14 2.86
Recency 28 May 2019 4 January 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 25% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and UHD Graphics 710.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Intel UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 371 vote

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 128 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.