Radeon RX 7700S vs UHD Graphics 770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 with Radeon RX 7700S, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
6.16

RX 7700S outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 544% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking580110
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Power efficiency28.1527.18
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40320.0
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.16
RX 7700S 39.64
+544%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016
RX 7700S 15275
+1403%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 770 16443
RX 7700S 37918
+131%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 770 3428
RX 7700S 24246
+607%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics 770 2655
RX 7700S 10206
+284%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−583%
123
+583%
1440p9−10
−578%
61
+578%
4K14
−271%
52
+271%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
−508%
70−75
+508%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−444%
85−90
+444%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−446%
70−75
+446%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−682%
130−140
+682%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−538%
80−85
+538%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−630%
70−75
+630%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−500%
100−110
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−390%
190−200
+390%
Hitman 3 12−14
−633%
85−90
+633%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−359%
170−180
+359%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−713%
130−140
+713%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−629%
150−160
+629%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−162%
130−140
+162%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−444%
85−90
+444%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−914%
70−75
+914%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−682%
130−140
+682%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−538%
80−85
+538%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−630%
70−75
+630%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−500%
100−110
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−390%
190−200
+390%
Hitman 3 12−14
−633%
85−90
+633%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−359%
170−180
+359%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−713%
130−140
+713%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−828%
167
+828%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−162%
130−140
+162%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−444%
85−90
+444%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−914%
70−75
+914%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−538%
80−85
+538%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−630%
70−75
+630%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−390%
190−200
+390%
Hitman 3 12−14
−633%
85−90
+633%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
−1317%
170−180
+1317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−800%
144
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−833%
84
+833%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−162%
130−140
+162%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−600%
60−65
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−717%
45−50
+717%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−586%
45−50
+586%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1105%
220−230
+1105%
Hitman 3 10−11
−440%
50−55
+440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−600%
90−95
+600%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1440%
75−80
+1440%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−4500%
92
+4500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−408%
190−200
+408%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−545%
70−75
+545%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Hitman 3 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1075%
180−190
+1075%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1700%
50−55
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2050%
43
+2050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14−16
Far Cry 5 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−867%
55−60
+867%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 48
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is 583% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700S is 578% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700S is 271% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700S is 4500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7700S surpassed UHD Graphics 770 in all 70 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.16 39.64
Recency 27 September 2022 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7700S, on the other hand, has a 543.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700S is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7700S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
AMD Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1268 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 106 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.