Radeon PRO W7800 vs UHD Graphics 770

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 with Radeon PRO W7800, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
5.31

PRO W7800 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 1123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking59716
Place by popularity85not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.67
Power efficiency28.1419.85
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564480
Core clock speed300 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40707.0
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 770 5.31
PRO W7800 64.92
+1123%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016
PRO W7800 29010
+2755%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−1122%
220−230
+1122%
4K13
−1054%
150−160
+1054%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data11.36
4Kno data16.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 15
−1100%
180−190
+1100%
Counter-Strike 2 52
−1054%
600−650
+1054%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−1082%
130−140
+1082%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 11
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−1108%
290−300
+1108%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−1076%
400−450
+1076%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Far Cry 5 17
−1076%
200−210
+1076%
Fortnite 35−40
−1043%
400−450
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
Forza Horizon 5 18
−1122%
220−230
+1122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1082%
260−270
+1082%
Valorant 65−70
−1094%
800−850
+1094%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−1114%
170−180
+1114%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−1108%
290−300
+1108%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−1098%
1150−1200
+1098%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Dota 2 43
−1063%
500−550
+1063%
Far Cry 5 16
−1088%
190−200
+1088%
Fortnite 35−40
−1043%
400−450
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
Forza Horizon 5 16
−1088%
190−200
+1088%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Metro Exodus 5
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1082%
260−270
+1082%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−1122%
220−230
+1122%
Valorant 65−70
−1094%
800−850
+1094%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−1108%
290−300
+1108%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Dota 2 40
−1025%
450−500
+1025%
Far Cry 5 14
−1114%
170−180
+1114%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1082%
260−270
+1082%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Valorant 65−70
−1094%
800−850
+1094%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−1043%
400−450
+1043%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−1036%
500−550
+1036%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−1116%
450−500
+1116%
Valorant 65−70
−1054%
750−800
+1054%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1114%
170−180
+1114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1076%
200−210
+1076%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Valorant 27−30
−1107%
350−400
+1107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Dota 2 14
−1114%
170−180
+1114%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and PRO W7800 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7800 is 1122% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7800 is 1054% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.31 64.92
Recency 27 September 2022 13 April 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 260 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 1633.3% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has a 1122.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1309 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 36 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 770 or Radeon PRO W7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.