Radeon 880M vs UHD Graphics 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 and Radeon 880M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
6.15

880M outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking574274
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Power efficiency28.5191.61
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1Strix Point
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256512
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4092.80
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.15
Radeon 880M 19.76
+221%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016
Radeon 880M 7624
+650%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 770 16443
+17.3%
Radeon 880M 14014

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 770 3428
Radeon 880M 8463
+147%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 770 119185
+131%
Radeon 880M 51662

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics 770 2655
Radeon 880M 3197
+20.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−111%
38
+111%
4K13
−208%
40−45
+208%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
−192%
35−40
+192%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−208%
40−45
+208%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
Hitman 3 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−220%
160−170
+220%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−208%
120−130
+208%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 880M is 111% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 880M is 208% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 22 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.15 19.76
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm

Radeon 880M has a 221.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1218 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.