Arc A580 vs UHD Graphics 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 and Arc A580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
6.14

Arc A580 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking54985
Place by popularity22not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.2939.42
ArchitectureAlder Lakeno data
GPU code nameAlder Lake xGDG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)10 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$878 $337

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A580 has 2956% better value for money than UHD Graphics 770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323072
Core clock speedno data1700 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40384.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speed1550 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.14
Arc A580 41.42
+575%

Arc A580 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 770 2761
Arc A580 11584
+320%

Arc A580 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 320% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 770 16443
Arc A580 35210
+114%

Arc A580 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 114% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 770 2834
Arc A580 95677
+3276%

Arc A580 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 3276% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 770 2738
Arc A580 27574
+907%

Arc A580 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 907% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 770 179804
+57.8%
Arc A580 113974

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Arc A580 by 58% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−482%
99
+482%
1440p8−9
−600%
56
+600%
4K14
−157%
36
+157%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
−567%
80−85
+567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13 no data
Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−550%
65−70
+550%
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5 no data
Hitman 3 2−3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 482% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 600% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 157% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.14 41.42
Recency 4 January 2022 10 October 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 175 Watt

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1071 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 181 vote

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.