Radeon 625 OEM vs UHD Graphics 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking656not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate20.8024.58
Floating-point performance0.6656 gflops0.7864 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 750 and Radeon 625 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a notebook card while Radeon 625 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
AMD Radeon 625 OEM
Radeon 625 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 368 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 625 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.