Radeon RX Vega Mobile vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking762not rated
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Power efficiency15.09no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2Vega Mobile
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)7 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1841792
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45no data
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs23no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.103-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 7 January 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 90 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 3 months, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Radeon RX Vega Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3765 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 292 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.