Radeon RX 6600M vs UHD Graphics 630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 630 with Radeon RX 6600M, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 630
2017
15 Watt
3.09

RX 6600M outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a whopping 1061% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking761136
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Power efficiency14.1224.58
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1841792
Core clock speed350 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors189 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45270.6
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs23112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.1.1031.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 3.09
RX 6600M 35.87
+1061%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192
RX 6600M 13819
+1059%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 630 1790
RX 6600M 31868
+1681%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 630 7704
RX 6600M 72686
+843%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 630 1211
RX 6600M 23525
+1843%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 630 9798
RX 6600M 144612
+1376%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 630 106362
RX 6600M 479404
+351%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics 630 415
RX 6600M 7840
+1791%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

UHD Graphics 630 15
RX 6600M 159
+946%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

UHD Graphics 630 29
RX 6600M 180
+525%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

UHD Graphics 630 3
RX 6600M 164
+4870%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

UHD Graphics 630 16
RX 6600M 207
+1194%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

UHD Graphics 630 14
RX 6600M 102
+629%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

UHD Graphics 630 3
RX 6600M 96
+3000%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

UHD Graphics 630 8
RX 6600M 120
+1363%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

UHD Graphics 630 0
RX 6600M 30
+9733%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

UHD Graphics 630 13
RX 6600M 172
+1265%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−519%
99
+519%
1440p10
−430%
53
+430%
4K7
−343%
31
+343%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5
−2100%
110
+2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−1443%
108
+1443%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−9400%
95
+9400%
Battlefield 5 10
−1050%
110−120
+1050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−929%
70−75
+929%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1400%
90
+1400%
Far Cry 5 7
−1014%
75−80
+1014%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
−889%
85−90
+889%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−507%
180−190
+507%
Hitman 3 6
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−557%
150−160
+557%
Metro Exodus 13
−792%
110−120
+792%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−844%
85−90
+844%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−694%
120−130
+694%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
−310%
120−130
+310%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−2111%
199
+2111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7800%
79
+7800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−2200%
110−120
+2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−929%
70−75
+929%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1100%
72
+1100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1200%
75−80
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1013%
85−90
+1013%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−574%
180−190
+574%
Hitman 3 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−557%
150−160
+557%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2800%
110−120
+2800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−1342%
173
+1342%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−393%
70−75
+393%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
−339%
120−130
+339%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−778%
79
+778%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−6800%
69
+6800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−929%
70−75
+929%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−917%
61
+917%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1200%
75−80
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−888%
168
+888%
Hitman 3 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−483%
134
+483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−1291%
153
+1291%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−507%
85
+507%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−51.3%
59
+51.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−980%
50−55
+980%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1600%
51
+1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1700%
36
+1700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1125%
98
+1125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3000%
62
+3000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−853%
180−190
+853%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−917%
60−65
+917%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1350%
29
+1350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7300%
74
+7300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−675%
30−35
+675%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
+0%
100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52
+0%
52
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and RX 6600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is 519% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600M is 430% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600M is 343% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6600M is 9400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 35.87
Recency 1 October 2017 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600M, on the other hand, has a 1060.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6600M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3913 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1003 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.