Radeon HD 8750A vs UHD Graphics 630

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking762not rated
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Power efficiency14.12no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2Mars
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)2 February 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores184384
Core clock speed350 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4514.40
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs2324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1MXM-A (3.0)
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 2 February 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Radeon HD 8750A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8750A is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3905 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.