RTX A2000 Embedded vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking762not rated
Place by popularity48not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2GA107S
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (6 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores242560
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1177 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4594.16
Floating-point performance0.4232 gflops6.026 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and RTX A2000 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while RTX A2000 Embedded is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX A2000 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3725 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.