Quadro T600 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 630 with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 630
2017
15 Watt
3.09

T600 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a whopping 494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking761301
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Power efficiency14.1231.48
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores184896
Core clock speed350 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4578.96
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS2.527 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs2356

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 3.09
T600 Mobile 18.37
+494%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192
T600 Mobile 7077
+494%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 630 1790
T600 Mobile 10498
+487%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 630 7704
T600 Mobile 39112
+408%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 630 1211
T600 Mobile 7928
+555%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 630 9798
T600 Mobile 53941
+451%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics 630 415
T600 Mobile 2766
+567%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−219%
51
+219%
1440p10
−450%
55−60
+450%
4K7
−471%
40−45
+471%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5
−420%
24−27
+420%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−429%
35−40
+429%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Battlefield 5 10
−440%
50−55
+440%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−371%
30−35
+371%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Far Cry 5 7
−657%
53
+657%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−250%
100−110
+250%
Hitman 3 6
−433%
30−35
+433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−257%
80−85
+257%
Metro Exodus 13
−477%
75−80
+477%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−400%
45−50
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−231%
53
+231%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
−173%
80−85
+173%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−980%
50−55
+980%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−371%
30−35
+371%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−717%
49
+717%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−289%
100−110
+289%
Hitman 3 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−257%
80−85
+257%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−225%
39
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−247%
52
+247%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
−193%
80−85
+193%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−650%
45
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−518%
100−110
+518%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−465%
130−140
+465%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−491%
65−70
+491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−100%
28
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−110%
80−85
+110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 219% faster in 1080p
  • T600 Mobile is 450% faster in 1440p
  • T600 Mobile is 471% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T600 Mobile is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is ahead in 45 tests (66%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 18.37
Recency 1 October 2017 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

T600 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 494.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3912 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.