Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs UHD Graphics 630

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking761not rated
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Power efficiency14.12no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1844608
Core clock speed350 MHz1230 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors189 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45466.6
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs396
TMUs23288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 13 August 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 260 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 10 months, and 1633.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000 Passive, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3913 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 20 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.