NVS 4200M vs UHD Graphics 630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 630 with NVS 4200M, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 630
2017
15 Watt
3.10
+313%

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms NVS 4200M by a whopping 313% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7621158
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Power efficiency14.172.06
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2GF119
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores18448
Core clock speed350 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate26.456.480
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs34
TMUs238

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1MXM
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1.103N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 3.10
+313%
NVS 4200M 0.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192
+314%
NVS 4200M 288

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 630 1790
+253%
NVS 4200M 507

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 630 7704
+235%
NVS 4200M 2298

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+23.1%
13
−23.1%
1440p10
+400%
2−3
−400%
4K7
+600%
1−2
−600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+329%
7−8
−329%
Hitman 3 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Metro Exodus 13
+333%
3−4
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+350%
6−7
−350%
Hitman 3 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
−10.7%
30−35
+10.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Hitman 3 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and NVS 4200M compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 630 is 23% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 630 is 400% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics 630 is 600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 630 is 850% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the NVS 4200M is 11% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 630 is ahead in 33 tests (94%)
  • NVS 4200M is ahead in 2 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.10 0.75
Recency 1 October 2017 22 February 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has a 313.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 4200M in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while NVS 4200M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS 4200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3922 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 146 votes

Rate NVS 4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.