GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs UHD Graphics 630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 630 with GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 630
2017
15 Watt
3.09

GTX 775M Mac Edition outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking755730
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Power efficiency14.272.33
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2GK104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1841344
Core clock speed350 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4589.26
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS2.142 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs23112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1MXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
1440p10
+0%
10−12
+0%
4K7
+0%
7−8
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hitman 3 6
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Metro Exodus 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and GTX 775M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTX 775M Mac Edition is 7% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 3.37
Recency 1 October 2017 8 November 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 775M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 9.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics 630 and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3794 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.