UHD Graphics 750 vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 600 and UHD Graphics 750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 600
2017
5 Watt
0.87

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by a whopping 416% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1123654
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Power efficiency12.0820.79
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96256
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate7.80020.80
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusRing Bus
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 600 0.87
UHD Graphics 750 4.49
+416%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 600 334
UHD Graphics 750 1733
+419%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−400%
45−50
+400%
1440p1
−400%
5−6
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 0−1 9−10
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−41.9%
40−45
+41.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 0−1 9−10
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 11
−173%
30−33
+173%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−183%
16−18
+183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−41.9%
40−45
+41.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 0−1 9−10
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4
−325%
16−18
+325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−41.9%
40−45
+41.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 400% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 750 is 400% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 33 tests (62%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.87 4.49
Recency 11 December 2017 30 March 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has 200% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 416.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
HD 6620G Radeon HD 6620G
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
8800 GS GeForce 8800 GS
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 3474 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 388 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.