Radeon R7 M365 vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1201not rated
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Power efficiency12.30no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1Litho
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (8 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed200 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz960 MHz
Number of transistors189 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.80023.04
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs28
TMUs1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.0Not Listed
Vulkan+-
Mantle-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2017 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

UHD Graphics 600 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 600 and Radeon R7 M365. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 M365 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
AMD Radeon R7 M365
Radeon R7 M365

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 4115 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 600 or Radeon R7 M365, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.