Radeon 620 vs UHD Graphics 600
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 600 and Radeon 620, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
620 outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by a whopping 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1131 | 847 |
Place by popularity | 58 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 11.92 | 3.22 |
Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
GPU code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | Polaris 24 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 11 December 2017 (7 years ago) | 13 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Number of transistors | 189 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 50 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 7.800 | 24.58 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.1248 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 2 | 8 |
TMUs | 12 | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Other tests
- Passmark
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 9
−167%
| 24−27
+167%
|
1440p | 1
−100%
| 2−3
+100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 13
−46.2%
|
18−20
+46.2%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−19.4%
|
35−40
+19.4%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 11
−72.7%
|
18−20
+72.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 13
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−19.4%
|
35−40
+19.4%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−60%
|
8−9
+60%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−58.3%
|
18−20
+58.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−19.4%
|
35−40
+19.4%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 2−3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−333%
|
12−14
+333%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how UHD Graphics 600 and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:
- Radeon 620 is 167% faster in 1080p
- Radeon 620 is 100% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 620 is 400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 620 is ahead in 35 tests (74%)
- there's a draw in 12 tests (26%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.87 | 2.35 |
Recency | 11 December 2017 | 13 May 2019 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 50 Watt |
UHD Graphics 600 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.
Radeon 620, on the other hand, has a 170.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
The Radeon 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.