P102-100 vs UHD Graphics 600

Place in the ranking	1129	524
Place by popularity	50	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	3.25
Power efficiency	12.13	2.13
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Gemini Lake GT1	GP102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	11 December 2017 (6 years ago)	12 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	3200
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1582 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	1683 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.800	336.6
Floating-point processing power	0.1248 TFLOPS	10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	80
TMUs	12	200

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x4
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	5 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	440.3 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 600 0.87

P102-100 7.63
+777%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 600 334

P102-100 2945
+782%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10 −750%	85−90 +750%
1440p	1 −700%	8−9 +700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	7.05
1440p	no data	74.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−700%

24−27

+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Hitman 3	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	13 −746%	110−120 +746%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −771%	270−280 +771%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Hitman 3	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	11 −764%	95−100 +764%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6 −733%	50−55 +733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −746%	110−120 +746%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −771%	270−280 +771%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4 −775%	35−40 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −750%	85−90 +750%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −771%	270−280 +771%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−700%

8−9
+700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Hitman 3	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%