H200 SXM 141 GB vs UHD Graphics 32EU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake GT1GH100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2021 (4 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25616896
Core clock speed350 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1980 MHz
Number of transistorsno data80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate21.601,045
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS66.91 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs16528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared141 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.36 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.6N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 700 Watt

UHD Graphics 32EU has 4566.7% lower power consumption.

H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 32EU and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 32EU is a notebook card while H200 SXM 141 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 32EU
UHD Graphics 32EU
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
H200 SXM 141 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 32EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate H200 SXM 141 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.