Radeon R7 M260DX vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile UHD Graphics 24EU UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 32EU UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 48EU UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
VS
Radeon R5 A230 Radeon R5 M230 Radeon R5 M240 Radeon R5 M320 Radeon R5 M420 Radeon R5 M435 Radeon R6 M255DX Radeon R6 M340DX Radeon R6 M435DX Radeon R7 M260DX Radeon R8 M350DX Radeon R8 M435DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Radeon R7 M260DX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023
2.01
+9.8%

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) outperforms R7 M260DX by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
R7 M260DX R7 M260DX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking867887
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeJet
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)7 January 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24320
Core clock speed450 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz855 MHz
Number of transistorsno data690 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data17.10
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5472 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Valorant 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Metro Exodus 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Valorant 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Valorant 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and R7 M260DX compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is 14% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.01 1.83
Recency 3 January 2023 7 January 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Radeon R7 M260DX.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
Radeon R7 M260DX
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
vs
R7 M440 Radeon R7 M440
R7 M260DX Radeon R7 M260DX
vs
GT 730M GeForce GT 730M
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
vs
Iris Graphics 6100 Iris Graphics 6100
Quadro P520 P520
vs
Arc A350M Arc A350M
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
RX 7700 RX 7700
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
HD Graphics 16EU Mobile HD Graphics 16EU Mobile
vs
HD Graphics 6EU Mobile HD Graphics 6EU Mobile
K2100M K2100M
vs
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
Instinct MI325X Instinct MI325X
vs
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
GTX 660M GTX 660M
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
GTX 550 Ti GTX 550 Ti
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 685
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Pro WX Vega M GL Pro WX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 91 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 18 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M260DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) or Radeon R7 M260DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.