TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking154not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.88no data
Power efficiency9.42no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP102GP102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)4 November 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843840
Core clock speed1417 MHz1405 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1582 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9379.7
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs9696
TMUs224240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz11408 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s547.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 4 November 2017

TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Titan X Pascal and TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empir
TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 2995 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.